Author Interview with Sheila Dalton

Sheila Dalton, the author of The Girl in the Box, has generously given of her time to answer some questions.

1. How would you summarize The Girl in the Box?

A mute Mayan girl held captive in the Guatemalan jungle is rescued by a psychoanalyst she later kills. The doctor’s lover, Caitlin Shaugnessy, needs answers, and sets out on a turbulent journey to discover what led to the tragedy.

2. What drew you to write about Guatemala and the Mayan tragedy of the 1980’s?

A trip to Guatemala I took with a friend in the seventies, during the Civil War there. We saw many things that affected us deeply, and learned more about the genocide on our return to Canada. Generally, I am interested in other countries and cultures, and I feel empathy for those whose lives are touched by political violence. I also met a young Guatemalan man in Canada who told me about how people were forced to take sides even if they were apolitical, and how many, Maya in particular, were caught in the middle. Though my sympathies still lie with the Maya — the atrocities committed by the Guatemalan government were horrific –this spoke to my distrust of all political “isms”. We have only to look at Communism– so idealistic, so seemingly humane, and yet how destructive in practice, to see how futile they are at solving social ills.

3. How did you do your research? How much time did you spend in Guatemala?

I spent four months in Central America, most of it in Guatemala, in the seventies, then went back in the eighties for a few weeks. My notes from those visits helped, but I also had an author from Guatemala, Caroline Kellems, read the finished manuscript,. She pointed out some mistakes and added some details. I also spoke with Guatemalan immigrants to Canada, and lawyers who worked with refugees.

Other parts of the book also required research. Part of the story is about the state of psychoanalysis in Canada. I needed to delve into that history, which is quite fascinating. Canada was involved in a lot of questionable practices and experiments in psychiatry in those years, even more so than other countries. I also had a very good friend who was an analyst, plus a sister who is a therapist, who helped, and I read a lot.
I’ve had a strong interest in psychoanalysis since my twenties, so it was a pleasure for me to attend a Self-Psychology conference as well as read professional journals I already subscribed to.

Autism and its treatments, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, neural damage, and other psychiatric conditions also had to be researched so that I could present Inez realistically. Most of this was done by reading, but I also had contact with a father of an autistic boy who read the ms.
I needed to know about psychiatric facilities for the criminally insane, so I visited Penetanguishene, plus did research at the library.

Part of the book takes place in Labrador, and I visited there to get a feel for the atmosphere. I have always wanted to go to Labrador, so it was a case of combining research with pleasure. I loved it there, though I’m not a winter person at all!

4. Was there a real person who was the source of your inspiration for Inez, the mute Mayan girl or did you imagine her wholly? If so, how did the character come to life for you?

Inez is entirely imagined. I wish I could tell you exactly how she came to life, but I can’t. Sometimes brain processes can’t be pinned down. I can tell you that she didn’t come in a flash. Her gestation was slow, and she took her final form over a series of first drafts.

5. How do you combine writing with your work in the Toronto Public Library?

Writing while working as a librarian is hard, but not as hard as trying to combine writing with freelance editing, which I did for about ten years. I’ve spent a lot of holidays writing rather than vacationing, and though I made and kept a resolve never to put my writing before my child, I’m afraid I wasn’t so conscientious about friends and family, including my husband. I really had to make sacrifices to pursue writing. But I’ve also had the pleasure of traveling to places that relate to whatever I’m working on. For instance, a few years ago I went to Morocco, and then later Devon, England, and these trips resulted in the historical fiction I’m currently writing, about a young British woman who loses her parents to the Barbary corsairs, who traded in Christian slaves.
But instead of a honeymoon, I went back to Guatemala with a female friend! It’s a long story. I’m just lucky to have an incredibly understanding partner.

6. Who are your favourite authors and why?

I love Karen Connolly because the characters in her fiction, though in extreme situations, are believable and wonderfully drawn. I have many favourite authors, actually, and find more every day. Among Canadians, I also like Alyssa Neal, Pearl Luke, and, yes, Lilian Nattel! These three all write historical fiction, and do it very well. Their styles are subtle, their characters fascinating, and they are all able to weave a spell and take me into fascinating worlds I would otherwise never experience.

7. Is there anything else you’d like to add about The Girl in the Box or your process as a writer?

I wrote the Girl in the Box hoping it would be good enough to qualify as literary fiction, but also have popular appeal. I’m still not sure how well I’ve succeeded, but judging by the reviews on Amazon.com, general readers do seem to like the book. Other links: My book trailer and My website.

Thank you for your time, Sheila!

Advertisements
Categories Book StuffTags ,

13 thoughts on “Author Interview with Sheila Dalton

  1. What a great interview! As you know, I am always fascinated by psychoanalytic research and can easily imagine what interest it would arouse to delve deeply into it. Narrative and psychoanalysis are, after all, such related endeavours. I am also intrigued by Sheila’s decision to go to Guatemala for research rather than have a honeymoon. Now that’s dedication!

  2. Thank for hosting me on you blog, Lilian. I really appreciate it.

  3. Thank you, litlove. It’s not often I find someone who shares my interest in psychoanalysis. I agree with you about the link between narrative and analysis. What does not seem a natural fit to me is writing and my other great interest – meditation. In fact, they seem at odds. I know many creators who also meditate though, so it only matters on a theoretical level, I suppose.

  4. What a great interview, Sheila! The research and care you put into your book is obvious. We’re mutual fans…

    1. Great of you to leave a comment, Pearl. Thanks for all your support.

  5. Wonderful discussion! I think writing is meditative. Where do you see the contradiction, Sheila?

    1. Hi, Lilian
      The type of meditation I practice is Vipassana, or Insight, meditation. It encourages us to pull back from our own stories, which tend to keep us stuck in the realm of the ego; i.e., when we tell stories about ourselves in our heads (which most of us do constantly), we are reinforcing a sense of self that is, on a profound level, false. In order to escape our limited sense of who we are we have to curb this tendency to story telling, and stay in the moment, watching how our sense of self, and the different forms of consciousness arise, and thus weakening our identification with the small ‘s’ self.
      Writing, of course, involves story telling, not about ourselves, but it firmly anchors us in the world of egos. Also, the process of writing takes us right out of the moment and into the world of the imagination.
      So I have a problem reconciling the two world views, which in no way means I won’t continue to pursue both disciplines. And I’m sure there are writers and thinkers out there who could explain that this dichotomy is not as extreme as I think it is.
      Writing is meditative in the sense that it is thoughtful; the type of meditation I practice discourages thought, in a way. That’s it in a nutshell. But because of meditation I’m aware that I”m only working with concepts here, and concepts are in themselves limiting, and not ultimate truth.

      1. I don’t see that as contradictory, but different forms of meditation. Writing is closer, perhaps, to a loving-kindness meditation. But it’s just another way of arriving at truth.

        1. I totally agree that writing (and reading) are a way of arriving at truth, but they seem to me different paths entirely. But as I say that’s because I’m stuck in the concepts – a fault of my own mind. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. On an everyday level, I hope to get unstuck some day.

        2. If you move away from the concepts and focus on the experience, what does that tell you? Perhaps it’s different from mine.

        3. The experience is meditative in the sense that it can take me out of my own life and concerns (though this isn’t always the case, as I tend to have thoughts about publication come up as I work), but it is writing keeps my mind very busy and not at all “mindful”. But it’s true that everyone’s experience is different.

  6. hmm book looks interesting

    1. Thank you, j.bell. It was kind of torture to write, but I always felt it would be worth the effort. If you live in Toronto, you can borrow it from the library.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close