*The Golden Mean

The Golden Mean by Annabel Lyon is terrific. I’ll start with that and recommend that you go out and buy it.

This is a novel about Aristotle before he became Aristotle. He isn’t a young man when the book begins. He is 37 years old and is inspecting his wife’s vulva and vagina out of intellectual curiosity. His curiosity is great and he covets knowledge of all things.

The story follows his experiences for the next 7 years or so, while he is the tutor of Alexander the Great before he became the Great, still just the kid of King Philip of Macedon. The capital city, Pella, is a rough and tumble backwater. Aristotle longs for Athens, where he will, beginning in middle-age, found an academy and write the works that will influence science and thought for the next 1500 years or more.

The story is told in the first person and it’s very much an interior journey. There is no overarching narrative, no through line of plot, but it held my interest throughout because it’s so very well done. The voice of Aristotle, his thoughts, his feelings, his perspective and reminiscences are compelling. I know that this is one of the buzz words of blurbs (along with tour de force), but in this case the word is the right one. The historical period is brought vividly to life, not in external details, but through this perspective.

Aristotle is a nerd in a world of jocks, an intellectual among uncultured warriors whose king wants to put some shine on his court. Aristotle is both respected and mocked, seen as effeminate, and yet oddly valued. A king’s friend, he is aware of his precarious position. He is a man of great mental powers and at the same time, a man of his period, shocked when his wife experiences sexual pleasure, not especially kind to women or slaves, but more considerate than some.

Of necessity, since ancient Greece restricted women’s movements, especially upper class women, the story is mostly about men, but Lyon conveys the poignancy of this restriction effectively. One moment stands out for me especially, when Alexander’s mother comes to visit him at school, and pays dearly for it because she is not supposed to leave her quarters. I also enjoyed the character and voice of the slave/midwife Athea.

(As an aside, I liked her so much I was thinking that if I was writing the book she would be my main character and then laughed at myself, because of course I did that in The River Midnight, albeit set in a later historical period.)

This must have been a hard book to bring to a conclusion because there isn’t a narrative arc. There is no resolution, just another stage in the journey. I say this because my only quibble with this book, and it’s a small one, is at the end. The last few pages are, like the rest, terrific. But just before that there is a conversation between Aristotle and Alexander that sums up their relationship, and I just couldn’t picture it as real. But then it’s over, the author returns to Aristotle’s voice, which has been so–yes I’ll say it again–compelling throughout. Aristotle leaves for Athens. He is about to become Aristotle.

Interior, first person stories are not my favourite form. It has to be excellently executed to hold my interest, to impress and stay with me. The Golden Mean did.

Advertisements
Categories Book StuffTags , ,

10 thoughts on “*The Golden Mean

  1. I had no idea this book was out there — it sounds terrific! Thanks for the review.

  2. A wonderful review! I’ve heard so much about this book that now I must really get my hands on it. Thank you!

    Have ben enjoying getting to know your blog since a couple of visits you’ve made to mine.

  3. I actually like interior first person stories, and this really sounds interesting. Not something I would normally find myself reaching for, but your review makes me think differently!

  4. bloglily, it was terrific. i felt like i had a felt sense of the time and place through Aristotle’s feelings and reactions.

    marja-leena, thank you. i very much enjoyed your art gallery.

    becca, it isn’t something i would necessarily reach for either, but it fell into my hands, and i’m grateful because it’s good to read what i wouldn’t otherwise. it’s one of the things i like so much about reading book blogs.

  5. This sounds really interesting. I’m always curious about books that take a famous person and attempt to give them new life. I’ll add this to my wishlist. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

  6. No! Stop! No more must-have recommendations! It’s too much – I’m drowning here!! Actually, I have a plan: this sounds like one I might persuade Llew to read, and then it’s not really like I’m buying it for myself at all…

    Sounds fantastic, Lilian.

  7. Verbivore–I like her approach in focusing on Aristotle’s life before he became so well known, both in his own time, and what he’s best known for now.

    Di, that made me laugh. Yes do get it for Llew, but of course you should check it out first. Like a taster, you know?

  8. How interesting! I don’t think I’ve ever read historical fiction based so far back in time. You make it sound most intriguing, though!

  9. I wonder if they had such intercepters in Aristotle’s time… sipping from the poisoned chalice to save the kings and noblemen… Llew would enjoy the inference of my being his taster, I think!

  10. Litlove, I don’t think I have either. And I think she made a good choice in her approach.

    Di, I suspect that they did. Poisoning rivals didn’t start in the middle ages!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close